Skip to main content

Graph - Example

Graph - Example


Leetcode 133. Clone Graph

Given a reference of a node in a connected undirected graph.

Return a deep copy (clone) of the graph.

Each node in the graph contains a value (int) and a list (List[Node]) of its neighbors.

class Node {

    public int val;

    public List<Node> neighbors;

}

Test case format:

For simplicity, each node's value is the same as the node's index (1-indexed). For example, the first node with val == 1, the second node with val == 2, and so on. The graph is represented in the test case using an adjacency list.

An adjacency list is a collection of unordered lists used to represent a finite graph. Each list describes the set of neighbors of a node in the graph.

The given node will always be the first node with val = 1. You must return the copy of the given node as a reference to the cloned graph.

Constraints:

The number of nodes in the graph is in the range [0, 100].

1 <= Node.val <= 100

Node.val is unique for each node.

There are no repeated edges and no self-loops in the graph.

The Graph is connected and all nodes can be visited starting from the given node.


Analysis:

This is a classic and also fundamental question in graph.

Before we try to clone a graph, let think about how to traversal a graph. Either dfs or bfs would work.

So we can add the cloning node during graph traversal.

The tricky part is how to maintain the edges between nodes, which connects the nodes together, or to form a graph.

One solution is to use a hash_map, which maps the node-to-node relationship between the original and the cloned graphs. With this map, it would be easy to re-construct the edges between the nodes in the cloned graph.

1. Only create the node when it does not exist, or is NULL;

2. Just need to add the neighbors nodes to each node in the cloned graph as that in the original graph.


See the code below:

/*
// Definition for a Node.
class Node {
public:
    int val;
    vector<Node*> neighbors;

    Node() {}

    Node(int _val, vector<Node*> _neighbors) {
        val = _val;
        neighbors = _neighbors;
    }
};
*/
class Solution {
public:
    Node* cloneGraph(Node* node) {
        if(!node) return node;
        Node* copy = new Node(node->val, {});
        unordered_map<Node*, Node*> mp;
        mp[node] = copy;
        queue<Node*> q;
        q.push(node);
        while(q.size()) {
            auto t = q.front();
            q.pop();
            for(auto &a : t->neighbors) {
                if(!mp.count(a)) {
                    mp[a] = new Node(a->val, {});
                    q.push(a);
                }
                mp[t]->neighbors.push_back(mp[a]);
            }
        }
        return copy;
    }
};


Upper Layer

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Binary Search - Hard Level - Question 3

Binary Search - Hard Level - Question 3 878. Nth Magical Number A positive integer is magical if it is divisible by either a or b. Given the three integers n, a, and b, return the nth magical number. Since the answer may be very large, return it modulo 10^9 + 7. Analysis: Let us consider some examples first. Example 1, a = 4, b = 2. If b is dividable by a, then all the numbers which is dividable by a should be dividable by b as well. So the nth magical number should be n*b; Example 2, a = 3, b = 2. The multiples of 2 are: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, ... The multiple of 3 are: 3, 6, 9, 12, ... So the overlap is related to the minimum common multiple between a and b, and we need to remove the overlap which is double-counted. So now, we make some conclusions: 1. the upper bound of the nth magical number should be n*b, where a is the smaller one (or b <= a); 2. there are n*b/a magical numbers smaller than n*b; 3. there are n*b/(minimum common multiple) overlaps. Thus, the overall count is: n + ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Segment Tree

Segment tree can be viewed as an abstract data structure which using some more space to trade for speed. For example, for a typical question with O(N^2) time complexity, the segment tree method can decrease it to O(N*log(N)).  To make it understandable, let us consider one example. Say we have an integer array of N size, and what we want is to query the maximum with a query range [idx1, idx2], where idx1 is the left indexes, and idx2 is the right indexes inclusive. If we only do this kind of query once, then we just need to scan through the array from idx1 to idx2 once, and record the maximum, done. The time complexity is O(N), which is decent enough in most cases even though it is not the optimal one (for example, with a segment tree built, the time complexity can decrease down to O(log(N))). However, how about we need to query the array N times? If we continue to use the naïve way above, then the time complexity is O(N^2), since for each query we need to scan the query range once...
Post a Comment
Read more

Recursion - Example

Recursion - Example Leetcode 231  Power of Two Given an integer n, return true if it is a power of two. Otherwise, return false. An integer n is a power of two, if there exists an integer x such that n == 2^x Constraints: -2^31 <= n <= 2^31 - 1 Analysis: One way is to think about this question recursively: if n%2 == 1, then n must not be power of 2; if not, then we just need to consider whether (n/2) is a power of 2 or not. This is exactly the "same question with a smaller size"! It is trivial to figure out the base cases: if n == 0, return false; if n == 1, return true. See the code below: class Solution { public: bool isPowerOfTwo(int n) { // base cases if(n == 0) return false; if(n == 1) return true; // converging if(n%2 == 1) return false; return isPowerOfTwo(n/2); } }; If interested, there are some other ways to solve this problem. For example, using bit manipulation, we can have the following solution: class ...
Post a Comment
Read more