Skip to main content

Backtracking

Backtracking may be one of the most "brute-force" algorithm. When all the other algorithms, such as, breadth-first-search (bfs), depth-first-search(dfs), and others, do not work, we can consider backtracking. With backtracking, the problem will be solved incrementally.

One of key features of backtracking is that we will do a "try step" first. Then we continue the search. If eventually the result is not valid, we have to back-track the "try step". And then make a second "try step", and so on, until make all the possible try steps.

If there are N steps in total, and for each step, there are M possible trials, then the overall complexity is (M^N), which increases really fast as a function of M or N.

The trial structure is layer by layer: once you make a trial, then based on this trial, you may continue to make the next trial on the "next layer", since we do not know yet whether the trials is a valid one or not. So we may have a chain of trials in different layers. Once we reach the step (converging to the base case) to know the correctness, we can make a decision. If it is valid, it means we find a good (valid) solution; if not, we need to go back to the "most recent" trial (or the one in the most recent layer of trial), reset the trial, and try the second possible route, ..., until we finish all the trial in the last layer.

If all the trials in the last layer do not work, then we need to go back to the second last layer, and reset the trial that we had made there, and try the second possible route, ...

Until we iterate all the possible trials in "all the layers".

Maybe you still do not get the point of the backtracking, but no worries, there are many classic questions to help illustrate the concept of it, some of which will be included in the question posts below.

To sum up, backtracking is

1. pretty brute-force;

2. make a trial step first; if does not work eventually, need to step back and start the next possible trial;

3. solve problems incrementally


Question List


Upper Layer

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trie

Trie is a data structure belonging to n-ary trees, which is designed for some specific questions, such as, prefix of strings. (If you have never known what binary tree is, maybe you can check binary tree first before read more about Trie). The fact that there are only 26 different letters greatly reduce the possible choices for each position. Or to make it clear, for each position, there are 26 different choices. In mathematics, it seems to be very large (height^26 for the full tree), but in reality, it is rare to be a full tree for the set of meaningful strings (needs at least height^26 strings to be a full tree!), since the height or length of English words are less than 10 in most cases. Therefore, it is popular in string matching or related operations. Please be noted that the trie structure is not only limited to strings, the same idea can be extended to other data types, such as integer (then it becomes a binary tree, since for bit, there are only two possible values). In the cod...

Stack - Question 1

Questions: We have an integer array with size n. The index of the first number is 0, and the last one is n-1. For each number, please find the index of the first number higher than it on the right side. If there is no such number, return -1. Constains: 1 <= n <= 10^5 Analysis: If we fix each number, then run a for loop for all the numbers on its right side in the array, we can find the first number that is larger. But the time complexity would be O(N^2) overall. We need to find a solution that runs faster. A stack can be used for this: since we are looking for the first element higher on the right side, we can maintain a monotonically decreasing order inside the stack. When scanning to a new number,  1. if the stack is empty or the top element (the end of the numbers in the stack) is larger, just put the new number in the stack. Since the new number is smaller, the numbers in the stack still decreases; 2. if the stack is not empty and the top element is smaller than the new n...