Skip to main content

Double Pointers - Question 1

167. Two Sum II - Input Array Is Sorted

Given a 1-indexed array of integers numbers that is already sorted in non-decreasing order, find two numbers such that they add up to a specific target number. Let these two numbers be numbers[index1] and numbers[index2] where 1 <= index1 < index2 <= numbers.length.

Return the indices of the two numbers, index1 and index2, added by one as an integer array [index1, index2] of length 2.

The tests are generated such that there is exactly one solution. You may not use the same element twice.

Your solution must use only constant extra space.


Constraints:

2 <= numbers.length <= 3 * 104
-1000 <= numbers[i] <= 1000
numbers is sorted in non-decreasing order.
-1000 <= target <= 1000
The tests are generated such that there is exactly one solution.


Analysis:

The array is sorted, so we may want to consider binary search, but actually we can use a two-pointer method to quickly solve this problem, which is faster than the binary search method.

The first pointer (p1) points to the start, and the other (p2) points to the end.
At each step, we only have three possible cases, which are listed below

while (p1 < p2)
    if numbers[p1] + numbers[p2] == sum
        return {p1, p2};
    else if numbers[p1] + numbers[p2] < sum
        ++p1;
    else
        --p2;

Since we just scan the array (at most) once, the time complexity is O(N), where N is the array size. The space complexity is O(1).

If we use binary search, we need to fix the first element first, then do a binary search. So the overall time complexity is O(Nlog(N)).


See the code below:

class Solution {
public:
    vector<int> twoSum(vector<int>& numbers, int target) {
        int x = 1, y = (int)numbers.size();
        while(x < y) {
            int sum = numbers[x-1] + numbers[y-1];
            if (sum == target) {
                return {x, y};
            } else if (sum < target) {
                ++x;
            } else {
                --y;
            }
        }
        return {-1, -1};
    }
};



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Segment Tree

Segment tree can be viewed as an abstract data structure which using some more space to trade for speed. For example, for a typical question with O(N^2) time complexity, the segment tree method can decrease it to O(N*log(N)).  To make it understandable, let us consider one example. Say we have an integer array of N size, and what we want is to query the maximum with a query range [idx1, idx2], where idx1 is the left indexes, and idx2 is the right indexes inclusive. If we only do this kind of query once, then we just need to scan through the array from idx1 to idx2 once, and record the maximum, done. The time complexity is O(N), which is decent enough in most cases even though it is not the optimal one (for example, with a segment tree built, the time complexity can decrease down to O(log(N))). However, how about we need to query the array N times? If we continue to use the naïve way above, then the time complexity is O(N^2), since for each query we need to scan the query range once...

Bit Manipulation - Example

  Leetcode 136 Single Number Given a non-empty array of integers nums, every element appears twice except for one. Find that single one. You must implement a solution with a linear runtime complexity and use only constant extra space. Constraints: 1 <= nums.length <= 3 * 10^4 -3 * 10^4 <= nums[i] <= 3 * 10^4 Each element in the array appears twice except for one element which appears only once. Analysis: If there is no space limitation, this question can be solved by counting easily. But counting requires additional space. Here we can use xor (^) operation based on some interesting observations:  A^A = 0, here A is any number A^0 = A, here A is any number Since all the number appears twice except one, then all the number appear even numbers will be cancelled out, and only the number appears one time is left, which is what we want. See the code below: class Solution { public: int singleNumber(vector<int>& nums) { int res = 0; for(auto ...

Rolling Hash

Rolling hash is one common trick used to increase efficiency of substring comparisons by compressing (or hashing) a string into a integer. After this step, we can compare two strings directly without comparing each chars. So the efficiency can be increased from O(N) to O(1). So how to implement the rolling hash? First we need to choose a base for the expansion and a modulo to mod. The basic formula is (suppose the window is n, and the rolling direction is from left to right), HashVal = (A1*p^(n-1) + A2*p^(n-2) + ... + An-1*p^1 + An*p^0)%mod where HashVal is the hash value, Ai is the ith element, p is the base, and mod is the modulo. To avoid collision as much as we can, p and modulo usually need to be large prime numbers. One corner case is that the base order in the above formula cannot be reversed. Or to be more clear, if the rolling direction is from left to right in an array, the first element should be in the highest order of the base, or times p^(n-1), and the last element times ...