Skip to main content

Double Pointers - Question 1

167. Two Sum II - Input Array Is Sorted

Given a 1-indexed array of integers numbers that is already sorted in non-decreasing order, find two numbers such that they add up to a specific target number. Let these two numbers be numbers[index1] and numbers[index2] where 1 <= index1 < index2 <= numbers.length.

Return the indices of the two numbers, index1 and index2, added by one as an integer array [index1, index2] of length 2.

The tests are generated such that there is exactly one solution. You may not use the same element twice.

Your solution must use only constant extra space.


Constraints:

2 <= numbers.length <= 3 * 104
-1000 <= numbers[i] <= 1000
numbers is sorted in non-decreasing order.
-1000 <= target <= 1000
The tests are generated such that there is exactly one solution.


Analysis:

The array is sorted, so we may want to consider binary search, but actually we can use a two-pointer method to quickly solve this problem, which is faster than the binary search method.

The first pointer (p1) points to the start, and the other (p2) points to the end.
At each step, we only have three possible cases, which are listed below

while (p1 < p2)
    if numbers[p1] + numbers[p2] == sum
        return {p1, p2};
    else if numbers[p1] + numbers[p2] < sum
        ++p1;
    else
        --p2;

Since we just scan the array (at most) once, the time complexity is O(N), where N is the array size. The space complexity is O(1).

If we use binary search, we need to fix the first element first, then do a binary search. So the overall time complexity is O(Nlog(N)).


See the code below:

class Solution {
public:
    vector<int> twoSum(vector<int>& numbers, int target) {
        int x = 1, y = (int)numbers.size();
        while(x < y) {
            int sum = numbers[x-1] + numbers[y-1];
            if (sum == target) {
                return {x, y};
            } else if (sum < target) {
                ++x;
            } else {
                --y;
            }
        }
        return {-1, -1};
    }
};



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brute Force - Question 2

2105. Watering Plants II Alice and Bob want to water n plants in their garden. The plants are arranged in a row and are labeled from 0 to n - 1 from left to right where the ith plant is located at x = i. Each plant needs a specific amount of water. Alice and Bob have a watering can each, initially full. They water the plants in the following way: Alice waters the plants in order from left to right, starting from the 0th plant. Bob waters the plants in order from right to left, starting from the (n - 1)th plant. They begin watering the plants simultaneously. It takes the same amount of time to water each plant regardless of how much water it needs. Alice/Bob must water the plant if they have enough in their can to fully water it. Otherwise, they first refill their can (instantaneously) then water the plant. In case both Alice and Bob reach the same plant, the one with more water currently in his/her watering can should water this plant. If they have the same amount of water, then Alice ...

Graph Question - Hard Level - Question 1

2246. Longest Path With Different Adjacent Characters You are given a tree (i.e. a connected, undirected graph that has no cycles) rooted at node 0 consisting of n nodes numbered from 0 to n - 1. The tree is represented by a 0-indexed array parent of size n, where parent[i] is the parent of node i. Since node 0 is the root, parent[0] == -1. You are also given a string s of length n, where s[i] is the character assigned to node i. Return the length of the longest path in the tree such that no pair of adjacent nodes on the path have the same character assigned to them. Constraints: n == parent.length == s.length 1 <= n <= 10^5 0 <= parent[i] <= n - 1 for all i >= 1 parent[0] == -1 parent represents a valid tree. s consists of only lowercase English letters. Analysis For this question, we need to construct a graph, or more specifically, a n-nary tree. How to construct the graph/tree? What we only know is the parent array. So we need to go through the parent array and constr...