Skip to main content

Segment Tree -Question 1

Most Beautiful Item for Each Query

You are given a 2D integer array items where items[i] = [pricei, beautyi] denotes the price and beauty of an item respectively.

You are also given a 0-indexed integer array queries. For each queries[j], you want to determine the maximum beauty of an item whose price is less than or equal to queries[j]. If no such item exists, then the answer to this query is 0.

Return an array answer of the same length as queries where answer[j] is the answer to the jth query.

Constraints:

1 <= items.length, queries.length <= 10^5

items[i].length == 2

1 <= pricei, beautyi, queries[j] <= 10^9


Analysis:

The first step can be to sort the items based on the price. Then we can narrow down the search range by a binary search.

But the beauty is not sorted yet. So if without further treatment, we need to scan through the query range, the time complexity is O(N). The query length could be as large as 1e5, thus the overall time complexity is O(N*M) ~ 1e10, which is too large to this question.

If use a segment tree, then the time complexity can decrease to O(M*log(N)).

The key step is to save the beauty values with the original order to a helper array with a double size, then build up the maximum values in a way like building a maximum-root heap (see the code below).

After having the segment-tree array, the time complexity is O(log(N)) for one query. The overall time complexity is O(M*log(N)) for M queries.


See the code below:

class Solution {
public:
    vector<int> maximumBeauty(vector<vector<int>>& items, vector<int>& queries) {
        vector<int> res;
        sort(items.begin(), items.end(), [](auto &a, auto &b) {
            return a[0] < b[0]; 
        });
        int n = items.size();
        vector<int> data(2*n, 0);
        for(int i=n; i<2*n; ++i) data[i] = items[i-n][1];
        build(data);
        for(auto &a : queries) {
            int id = findUpperBound(items, a);
            //cout<<id<<endl;
            res.push_back(query(data, 0, id-1));
        }
        return res;
    }
private:
    int findUpperBound(vector<vector<int>>& its, int val) {
        int left = 0, right = its.size();
        while(left < right) {
            int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
            //cout<<mid<<" "<<left<<" "<<right<<endl;
            if(its[mid][0] <= val) left = mid + 1;
            else right = mid;
        }
        return left;
    }
    void build(vector<int>& data) {
        int n = data.size();
        n /= 2;
        for(int i=n-1; i>0; --i) data[i] = max(data[2*i], data[2*i+1]);
    }
    int query(vector<int>& data, int left, int right) {
        if(left > right) return 0;
        int res = 0, m = data.size(), n = m/2;
        for(int i = left + n, j = right + n; i <= j; i /= 2, j /= 2) {
            if(i&1) res = max(res, data[i++]);
            if(!(j&1)) res = max(res, data[j--]);
        }
        return res;
    }
};


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brute Force - Question 2

2105. Watering Plants II Alice and Bob want to water n plants in their garden. The plants are arranged in a row and are labeled from 0 to n - 1 from left to right where the ith plant is located at x = i. Each plant needs a specific amount of water. Alice and Bob have a watering can each, initially full. They water the plants in the following way: Alice waters the plants in order from left to right, starting from the 0th plant. Bob waters the plants in order from right to left, starting from the (n - 1)th plant. They begin watering the plants simultaneously. It takes the same amount of time to water each plant regardless of how much water it needs. Alice/Bob must water the plant if they have enough in their can to fully water it. Otherwise, they first refill their can (instantaneously) then water the plant. In case both Alice and Bob reach the same plant, the one with more water currently in his/her watering can should water this plant. If they have the same amount of water, then Alice ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sweep Line

Sweep (or scanning) line algorithm is very efficient for some specific questions involving discrete intervals. The intervals could be the lasting time of events, or the width of a building or an abstract square, etc. In the scanning line algorithm, we usually need to distinguish the start and the end of an interval. After the labeling of the starts and ends, we can sort them together based on the values of the starts and ends. Thus, if there are N intervals in total, we will have 2*N data points (since each interval will contribute 2). The sorting becomes the most time-consuming step, which is O(2N*log(2N) ~ O(N*logN). After the sorting, we usually can run a linear sweep for all the data points. If the data point is labeled as a starting point, it means a new interval is in the processing; when an ending time is reached, it means one of the interval has ended. In such direct way, we can easily figure out how many intervals are in the processes. Other related information can also be obt...
Post a Comment
Read more

Graph - Medium Level - Question 1

Graph - Medium Level - Question 1 Leetcode 2049. Count Nodes With the Highest Score There is a binary tree rooted at 0 consisting of n nodes. The nodes are labeled from 0 to n - 1. You are given a 0-indexed integer array parents representing the tree, where parents[i] is the parent of node i. Since node 0 is the root, parents[0] == -1. Each node has a score. To find the score of a node, consider if the node and the edges connected to it were removed. The tree would become one or more non-empty subtrees. The size of a subtree is the number of the nodes in it. The score of the node is the product of the sizes of all those subtrees. Return the number of nodes that have the highest score. Constraints: n == parents.length 2 <= n <= 10^5 parents[0] == -1 0 <= parents[i] <= n - 1 for i != 0 parents represents a valid binary tree. Analysis: If we have had the binary tree, then we just can do a top-down count, to count the number of nodes for the sub-tree with the root as the curren...
Post a Comment
Read more