Skip to main content

Greedy Algorithm - Question 1

 Leetcode 435 Non-overlapping Intervals

Given an array of intervals intervals where intervals[i] = [starti, endi], return the minimum number of intervals you need to remove to make the rest of the intervals non-overlapping.

Constraints:

1 <= intervals.length <= 10^5

intervals[i].length == 2

-5 * 10^4 <= starti < endi <= 5 * 10^4


Analysis:

This question is equivalent to a classic question: interval scheduling, which searches for the maximum number of un-overlapping intervals. Once this number is found, then it is straightforward to calculate the minimum number of intervals to be removed.

When all the intervals are sorted with the ending time, then we can always pick up the first interval as the first step. Why does this always give the optimal result?

Because this interval ends the earliest!

Just because it ends the earliest, choosing it cannot be worse than choosing other intervals. Thus we can greedily choose the first one.

After the first one is chosen, we can again pick up the first interval with a starting time after the ending time of the first interval picked, The argument of the correctness is similar to the first one.

Therefore, for each step, we can always greedily pick up the first valid interval (no overlapping with the previous interval). (Just because it ends the earliest for all the rest intervals).


See the code below:


class Solution {
public:
    int eraseOverlapIntervals(vector<vector<int>>& intervals) {
        int n = intervals.size(), ct = 0, front = -1e5;
        sort(intervals.begin(), intervals.end(), [](auto &a, auto &b) {
            // if(a[1] == b[1]) return a[0] < b[0];
            return a[1] < b[1];
        });
        for(int i=0; i<n; ++i) {
            if(intervals[i][0] < front) continue;
            ++ct;
            front = intervals[i][1];
        }
        return n - ct;
    }
};


Upper Layer

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Binary Search - Hard Level - Question 3

Binary Search - Hard Level - Question 3 878. Nth Magical Number A positive integer is magical if it is divisible by either a or b. Given the three integers n, a, and b, return the nth magical number. Since the answer may be very large, return it modulo 10^9 + 7. Analysis: Let us consider some examples first. Example 1, a = 4, b = 2. If b is dividable by a, then all the numbers which is dividable by a should be dividable by b as well. So the nth magical number should be n*b; Example 2, a = 3, b = 2. The multiples of 2 are: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, ... The multiple of 3 are: 3, 6, 9, 12, ... So the overlap is related to the minimum common multiple between a and b, and we need to remove the overlap which is double-counted. So now, we make some conclusions: 1. the upper bound of the nth magical number should be n*b, where a is the smaller one (or b <= a); 2. there are n*b/a magical numbers smaller than n*b; 3. there are n*b/(minimum common multiple) overlaps. Thus, the overall count is: n + ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Segment Tree

Segment tree can be viewed as an abstract data structure which using some more space to trade for speed. For example, for a typical question with O(N^2) time complexity, the segment tree method can decrease it to O(N*log(N)).  To make it understandable, let us consider one example. Say we have an integer array of N size, and what we want is to query the maximum with a query range [idx1, idx2], where idx1 is the left indexes, and idx2 is the right indexes inclusive. If we only do this kind of query once, then we just need to scan through the array from idx1 to idx2 once, and record the maximum, done. The time complexity is O(N), which is decent enough in most cases even though it is not the optimal one (for example, with a segment tree built, the time complexity can decrease down to O(log(N))). However, how about we need to query the array N times? If we continue to use the naïve way above, then the time complexity is O(N^2), since for each query we need to scan the query range once...
Post a Comment
Read more

Recursion - Example

Recursion - Example Leetcode 231  Power of Two Given an integer n, return true if it is a power of two. Otherwise, return false. An integer n is a power of two, if there exists an integer x such that n == 2^x Constraints: -2^31 <= n <= 2^31 - 1 Analysis: One way is to think about this question recursively: if n%2 == 1, then n must not be power of 2; if not, then we just need to consider whether (n/2) is a power of 2 or not. This is exactly the "same question with a smaller size"! It is trivial to figure out the base cases: if n == 0, return false; if n == 1, return true. See the code below: class Solution { public: bool isPowerOfTwo(int n) { // base cases if(n == 0) return false; if(n == 1) return true; // converging if(n%2 == 1) return false; return isPowerOfTwo(n/2); } }; If interested, there are some other ways to solve this problem. For example, using bit manipulation, we can have the following solution: class ...
Post a Comment
Read more